Back in the 80s after the election of Ronald Reagan there was an often-repeated logic that made the rounds of public discourse, wandering out of mouths left-side and right-side alike. The basic drift: “Republicans may be full of crap, but the Democrats are hypocrites. And there’s nothing worse than a hypocrite.” I suspect that logic was conceived in a conservative think tank somewhere and found purchase with a lot of people.

To some extent, perhaps, hypocrisy is a bit of a natural in politics. To the extent that parties seek to grow their tent by gathering a disparate array of coalitions whose values may be diametrically opposed, they end up making diametrically opposed promises which, no matter how sincerely offered, become nearly impossible to maintain indefinitely. Eventually some priority propels one set of convictions over another and charges of hypocrisy and betrayal fly.

But Trump elevates hypocrisy to what may be its most distilled form: declaring with conviction and superlatives something on day #1 which he then denies with greater ferver on day #2. “Lying,” observes Masha Gessen, “is the message. It’s not just that both Putin and Trump lie, it is that they lie in the same way and for the same purpose: blatantly, to assert power over truth itself.” (http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/12/13/putin-paradigm-how-trump-will-rule/)

Long before Trump was rigging reality in D.C. the Republican party, aided and abetted by Fox News and its legions of feeder media cells, blogger sites, and evidence-defying chat rooms, made hypocrisy one of its central pillars.

Trump is, if anything, the distillation of Conservative values and actions in clown car caricature form. Since the clarion call against Democratic Party hypocrisy in the 80s the Republican party and by extension the Conservative movement indulge hypocrisy as their core defining means of communication.


Pages from the Conservative Playbook

The Trump playbook isn’t something he authored

Like everything else he champions, he simply plagiarized it, adding nothing more than his brand, which is, in turn, little more than a gilded superlative stamped on top of the playbook of American political and corporate conservatism.

In spite of it’s brazen defiance of reason and decency, his grifted tactics remain amazingly effective. Even as Trump buffets his party and administration, Democrats and the much of the press have a hard time recognizing and developing ways to comprehend and counter them. Often they’re not really trying.

Here is a 1st-stab at articulating the Conservative Playbook.

Accuse your opponent of what you have done, are doing, or are about to do, so that when you do it, you are inured to criticism. Logic as as follows:
a) You already accused them of doing it, so what you’re doing now can’t possibly be that same thing, because you’re the accuser, and accusers know better. (Accusation as vaccination)
b) They already did that terrible thing. So now, if they can do it, you can do it (The “They did it first!” grade school playground tactic)
c) Do as I say, not as I do (The grade school authoritarian tactic)
You can actually depend on such accusations as a kind of honest admission of misdeeds past, present and future. Examples are endless:
– “The Democrats’ are fiscally irresponsible” = Will drive up the debt, inflation, and push deregulation and inequality to such an extreme that the economy actually collapses.
– “Obama is a socialist, fascist dictator” = Will bring actual fascists like Sebastian Gorka and David Clarke into the inner circle; will favor and authoritarian leaders worldwide over more Democratic-leaning ones; will continue dog-whistling to neo-nazi and fascist groups across the country and worldwide.
– “Lock her up / she’s crooked” = Will ride roughshod over laws, ethics, morals, and custom.

1 – Accuse your opponent of always playing the victim
2 – Attack your opponent with patently false, outrageous, and absurdist cruelties
3 – Portray their counter arguments as false, outrageous, absurdest and cruel and most importantly, unwarranted.
4 – Dwell on #3 and play the victim to the max.

Do satire in tone, not in substance. Say something over top, using a tone that suggests you don’t really mean it, while simultaneously saying it with great conviction. Then, when you change your mind, reneg on your commitments, or otherwise indulge hypocrisy you can point to your use of ironic signaling as evidence you never really meant it.
For extra credit:
1 – accuse actual political satirists of using that exat same tactic.
2 – accuse your opponent of being a flip-flopper, and cite that as the worst thing imaginable.

Make outrageous first offers. Make outrageous second offers. Go in the opposite direction of compromise, so that when finally you settle, you’ve bent the negotiation toward an outrageous set of terms, and your lesser opponent will perceive any reprieve from crazy as the closest thing they’ll get to a negotiated compromise.

Layer false statements under other false statements. Create a foundation of falsehoods on which you present a top-level fallacious argument. (Classic example: “When did you stop beating your wife?” to a lifelong celibate gay pacifist who’s been a backwoods hermit for 20 years) Engage your opponent on that top-level argument, forcing them to argue the “when”, allowing the “beating” presupposition to stand unaddressed. This key building block of a fact-free reality.

They are features, not bugs. (Taken from the Vlad Putin authoritarian playbook as articulated by Masha Gessen here: http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/12/13/putin-paradigm-how-trump-will-rule/)
“Lying is the message. It’s not just that both Putin and Trump lie, it is that they lie in the same way and for the same purpose: blatantly, to assert power over truth itself.”

In taking the American myth of the self-made, rugged individualist beyond Ayn Rand’s wildest fantasy, the arguments, conclusions, policies and attitudes of the Republican party go far beyond outrage and anger. They’re about valuing cruelty, vindictiveness, hostility and sadism as ends in and of themselves. That makes sense: if radical de-regulation and limitless profits for corporations are your party’s core platform, convincing those on the losing end of that platform that struggle & misery are noble and honorable becomes paramount.

These tactics, among many others, are easily recognizable in Donald Trump, but he’s hardly the only purveyor. He’s merely the Republican Party’s character in distilled, clown car caricature form. And yet the conservatives, much as they nurse and stew this swamp by no means hold a monopoly ownership of it. They share it with actual monopolies — the oligarchy of global corporatism sustains itself, behind the scenes, writing their companies’ and our government’s policies from this playbook. Their advertising may be cheeky and perky, their products may be ubiquitous nicely-packaged, their demeanor playful but try confronting them in the courts (or increasingly the arbitration room), or merely calling their customer support, and you just as quickly discover your friendly corporation is, beneath it all, an adversary that will whip out the same playbook and run you through it, chapter and verse.

Are Credo Mobile’s progressive petitions the real deal or just a scam?

Are Credo Mobile’s progressive petitions a scam or the real deal?

Articles in Huffington Post and Daily Kos lend credibility while this self-proclaimed liberal blog calls foul, albeit based on their claims about cost of service.

That Credo seems never to publish verifiable evidence of their efficacy and legitimacy, sufficing with vague quotes like…
“building momentum… make a big difference”,
  “with your help, we’re making it”

The growing desert of bold claims on scant evidence should perhaps have sent up some yellow flags in the progressive blogosphere.

A cursory scrape of Credo’s published stats of 2017 petitions suggests they never reach their signature goals, no matter how much time passes. Their petition drives seem generally to launch and stay in the 70-90% range whether that goal is 400,000 signatures or a mere 150.

Does that mean they’ve never reached an intended goal? Or are they regularly moving the goal posts?

Do the numbers ever really change or are are they a fiction to drum up a sense of momentum and motivation? Is it a legitimate political effort or a siphon away from real action?

Below are the Credo-published stats for 62 of their 2017 petitions.
All data are Credo’s own and not independently verified.

Petition Title: “Block Sen. Jeff Sessions as attorney general”
Goal: 300000 Signatures
Achieved: 247668 Signatures
% Achieved: 82.55% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Sign the petition: Don’t let a climate denier run the EPA.”
Goal: 350000 Signatures
Achieved: 306008 Signatures
% Achieved: 87.43% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Senate Democrats: Block Tom Price’s HHS confirmation “
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 241 Signatures
% Achieved: 80.33% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Block the federal abortion ban”
Goal: 400 Signatures
Achieved: 378 Signatures
% Achieved: 94.5% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “It’s time to defend the Supreme Court”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 276 Signatures
% Achieved: 92% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop Trump from building the Dakota Access pipeline. #NoDAPL”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 126 Signatures
% Achieved: 84% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Warren: Make Trump disclose and divest”
Goal: 400 Signatures
Achieved: 375 Signatures
% Achieved: 93.75% (Since late Jan 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Rescind Trump’s racist and xenophobic Muslim ban”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 266 Signatures
% Achieved: 88.66% (Since early Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Why are business leaders enabling Trump’s hate?”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 182 Signatures
% Achieved: 91% (Since early Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “California must pass the California Values Act now”
Goal: 75 Signatures
Achieved: 63 Signatures
% Achieved: 84% (Since early Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Don’t legalize anti-LGBTQ discrimination”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 256 Signatures
% Achieved: 85.33% (Since early Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Democratic leaders: Hold the line against Trump cuts”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 246 Signatures
% Achieved: 82% (Since early Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Senate Democrats: Stop Trump’s anti-woman regime”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 153 Signatures
% Achieved: 76.5% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell TV networks: Stop broadcasting Trump’s lies”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 256 Signatures
% Achieved: 85.33% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell House Government Oversight Chair: Do your job. Investigate Trump’s corruption”
Goal: 350 Signatures
Achieved: 295 Signatures
% Achieved: 84.28% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell the U.S. Senate: Oppose and resist anti-worker Puzder nomination.”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 206 Signatures
% Achieved: 82.4% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell the media: Skip Trump’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 116 Signatures
% Achieved: 77.33% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Stop Bannon: No white supremacist on the National Security Council “
Goal: 350 Signatures
Achieved: 327 Signatures
% Achieved: 93.42% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Senate Democrats: Protect our consumer protection agency from Trump”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 221 Signatures
% Achieved: 88.4% (Since mid Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Demand An Independent Investigation Of The Trump Administration’s Collusion With Russia”
Goal: 400000 Signatures
Achieved: 330114 Signatures
% Achieved: 82.52% (Since late Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop Trump from starting a nuclear war”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 232 Signatures
% Achieved: 92.8% (Since late Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Why is Chuck Schumer letting Joe Manchin lead Senate Democrats?”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 175 Signatures
% Achieved: 87.5% (Since late Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop the attack on net neutrality”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 128 Signatures
% Achieved: 85.33% (Since late Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congressional Democrats: Block low-wage %u201Cright-to-work%u201D laws”
Goal: 100 Signatures
Achieved: 83 Signatures
% Achieved: 83% (Since late Feb 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell governors: Block mass deportations and Trump’s border wall”
Goal: 50 Signatures
Achieved: 37 Signatures
% Achieved: 74% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Time for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 263 Signatures
% Achieved: 87.66% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Sanders: Import safe, affordable prescription drugs”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 183 Signatures
% Achieved: 91.5% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “The NCAA and Texas’s discriminatory anti-LGBTQ laws”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 109 Signatures
% Achieved: 72.66% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: No racist and xenophobic Muslim ban 2.0”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 203 Signatures
% Achieved: 81.2% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell the Senate: Don’t defund Planned Parenthood.”
Goal: 400 Signatures
Achieved: 356 Signatures
% Achieved: 89% (Since early Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Support the Presidential Tax Transparency Act”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 276 Signatures
% Achieved: 92% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Senate Democrats: Block Trump’s attacks on immigrants”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 194 Signatures
% Achieved: 77.6% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop The Attack On The Endangered Species Act”
Goal: 200000 Signatures
Achieved: 115661 Signatures
% Achieved: 57.83% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: No Endless War in Syria”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 166 Signatures
% Achieved: 83% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Democratic leaders: Resist Trump’s handout to war profiteers”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 146 Signatures
% Achieved: 73% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “California must block Trump’s Muslim registry”
Goal: 25 Signatures
Achieved: 21 Signatures
% Achieved: 84% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell California Attorney General Xavier Becerra: Investigate Exxon”
Goal: 50 Signatures
Achieved: 38 Signatures
% Achieved: 76% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Warren: No big bank crony as Wall Street cop”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 169 Signatures
% Achieved: 84.5% (Since mid Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop the Republican assault on Medicare and Medicaid”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 229 Signatures
% Achieved: 91.6% (Since late Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Don’t let Republicans destroy the EPA”
Goal: 350 Signatures
Achieved: 295 Signatures
% Achieved: 84.28% (Since late Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “No re-election funds for any Senate Democrat who helps confirm Gorsuch”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 119 Signatures
% Achieved: 79.33% (Since late Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Sanders: We need Medicare for All.”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 233 Signatures
% Achieved: 93.2% (Since late Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “We need the truth about Trump and Russia”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 223 Signatures
% Achieved: 89.2% (Since late Mar 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Investigate collusion between Monsanto and the EPA”
Goal: 250 Signatures
Achieved: 203 Signatures
% Achieved: 81.2% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Rep. Blumenauer: No taxpayer money for Trump hotels”
Goal: 300 Signatures
Achieved: 266 Signatures
% Achieved: 88.66% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell state lawmakers and governors: No business with companies that build Trump’s wall of hate.”
Goal: 50 Signatures
Achieved: 42 Signatures
% Achieved: 84% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell California legislators: Kids need environmental education. Support S.B. 424”
Goal: 50 Signatures
Achieved: 24 Signatures
% Achieved: 48% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Stop Trump’s illegal war in Syria”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 121 Signatures
% Achieved: 80.66% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Democrats: Hold the line against Republican shutdown threats”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 130 Signatures
% Achieved: 86.66% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “21st Century Fox: Time to fire Bill O’Reilly”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 162 Signatures
% Achieved: 81% (Since early Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Franken: Fight Big Pharma. Lower drug prices.”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 143 Signatures
% Achieved: 71.5% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Sign the petition: White supremacist Steve Bannon must vacate the White House”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 128 Signatures
% Achieved: 85.33% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell the Senate: No anti-LGBTQ extremist as Army secretary”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 106 Signatures
% Achieved: 70.66% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: Stop Trump’s sneak attack on Social Security.”
Goal: 200 Signatures
Achieved: 170 Signatures
% Achieved: 85% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell FCC Chairman Ajit Pai: Don’t kill net neutrality”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 123 Signatures
% Achieved: 82% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop illegal cell phone searches at the border”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 95 Signatures
% Achieved: 63.33% (Since mid Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Democrats: Stand strong. No cuts to Planned Parenthood”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 136 Signatures
% Achieved: 90.66% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell traditional corporate media outlets: Stop glorifying war”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 103 Signatures
% Achieved: 68.66% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Amazon: Stop advertising on Breitbart”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 109 Signatures
% Achieved: 72.66% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stop the NRA: Block concealed carry reciprocity”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 109 Signatures
% Achieved: 72.66% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Stand with Sen. Merkley: Keep fossil fuels in the ground”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 111 Signatures
% Achieved: 74% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

Petition Title: “Tell Congress: No tax legislation until Trump releases all tax returns”
Goal: 150 Signatures
Achieved: 112 Signatures
% Achieved: 74.66% (Since late Apr 2017, possibly earlier)

The Bumper

The Bumper

Years ago when I started working I got ripped off. I was given a job that I wasn’t trained for. I was driving a 5-ton truck, navigating narrow alleyways getting $60/day for what was listed on the time card as an 8-hour day – $7.5/hour. The reality was never less than a 12-hour day ($5/hr) and just about every other day we did 18-hours ($3.33/hr) with at best an 8-hour turnaround. This was back in the early-90s. Today there’s some recognition that kids entering the workforce are getting shafted by crappy opportunities, low wages and inconsistent work hours. I’d argue it’s hardly unique to the millennial generation. The current Great American Shafting started years before, no doubt even before my time. And it’s gotten, I think worse, since my particular experience with it.

I had been on the job for about a week. I didn’t know anyone except the guy who recommended me for the job who I’d worked with for several days on my first job after college. I was so new I didn’t even know who my boss was yet. One day, driving that 5-ton through the narrow alleyway behind the warehouse we were working out of – brick & mortar to my left, parked cars to my right – I was driving under a mile an hour, checking the mirrors every few seconds. But it turned out the right view mirror didn’t capture stair step jutting out a few extra inches just behind the cab. That stair step managed to grab a reflector strip running horizontally across the bumper of one of one of the parked cars and peeled it off which in turn yanked the entire bumper partway off the front of the car. It made a terrible sound. The damage was technically minimal, but it looked awful. Curiously, it turned out to be my boss’s car. Her supervisor came screaming out of his office: “Your fired!” he repeated over and over again as a small crowd gathered to see the damage. He had a variety of incredulous phrases and curse words to embellish those lyrics, but basically that’s all he said. After some time the volume of his voice was quiet enough, the pauses between “you’re fired” were long enough, that I finally had enough time to respond. “I know,” I said.

As it turned out, I didn’t get fired. My rate got lowered to $50/day, and my boss took a day’s salary on top of collecting insurance to fix the car. (That’s the abbreviated telling. The truth is that my boss was thrilled I’d damaged her car. She was excited about the insurance money. Furthermore it wasn’t like I agreed to forego a day’s salary – a coveted $60 – I just simply didn’t get paid for a day’s work. It took several weeks before I found out it was not an oversight but part of her settlement agreement that was worked out unbeknownst to me.)

In those days I’d jot as many notes down as possible at work and compiled them at home and during down time. I wanted to be good at my job. Without that extra effort there was no on-the-job training. It couldn’t withstand on-the-job jealousy. The work environment was such that newbies were a threat to those with status, title and pay. The management-by-hollering approach at that and many subsequent jobs had little to do with a tough-love approach to getting the best out of staff. It wasn’t about discipline, skill-building, or building a powerful group dynamic. It was a mode of management to keep new kids bowed down with their salaries around their ankles while at the same time giving them enough leeway that they seem an up-and-coming threat to established hires.

Years later I see the same process repeated to new hires. Kids anxious to prove themselves professional are given low-pay high-responsibility jobs for which they aren’t trained. When they screw up they get threatened with being fired and are only too happy to take some kind of hit in order to survive hopefully long enough to acquire that skill and get that pay raise.

And now I see it from the other side: my bosses’ bosses see great opportunities in hiring today’s youth. They cost a fraction of those with talent, they have boundless energy and enthusiasm, and they “know all these new technologies”.

It turns out they know nothing, just as I did. They could use my help. I offer it when I can. For whatever the dynamic, they typically don’t accept it. The savings their low rates offer pale in comparison to the toll of their mistakes. Budgets double, triple, and not infrequently quintuple. Crisis mode is the rule not the exception. Newbies get berated, blamed and fired to save management ass. There is frequently a moment where someone says something about doing a “post mortem” before “we do this again next time”, but the post-mortems never come, and the process repeats itself.

This is what counts as business as usual: under-experienced new hires are positioned above their abilities, threatening sometimes actually replacing more experienced and better paid superiors. Effectively everyone is always on the chopping block. The justifications are numerous: we have to make do with the limited resources and schedule we’re dealt with, so we have to just push through this so the next gig will see an improvement, but reality is stubborn: the budget suffers, the schedule suffers, the quality of work suffers. The corporate workplace is a cauldron of pathology. It works for almost no one.

Michael Bloomberg v Trump at the DNC

Michael Bloomberg v Trump at the DNC

Michael Bloomberg really stuck it to Donald Trump — and the rest of us — right at the same time.


In the same Trump-bashing speech, he offered demonstratively contradictory false equivalence: “Republicans wrongly blame immigrants for our problems, and they stand in the way of action on climate change and gun violence. Meanwhile, many Democrats wrongly blame the private sector for our problems, and they stand in the way of action on education reform and deficit reduction.”

The private sector undeniably caused a hell of a lot of the problems progressive activists are pointing to. It’s worth taking the time to nuance out the complex relationship between the government and corporate interests to capture the dynamic that gave rise to stagnant wages, expensive, lackluster healthcare, failing infrastructure, and shoddy education.  Worth it but not here right now.

Perhaps the real genius of Donald Trump is that his extremist existence and sudden national clout allows the clueless and destructive opinions of billionaires to seem like a breath of fresh air.




It’s the kind of thing you associate with the Live Free or Die independent self-made, salt-of-the-earth American. And to the extent it points to someone running their small business, eeking out a living, they’re entitled to the full protection of the phrase. But when this gets coopted by large scale industry whose actions have significant and often dire consequence on the country and world they inhabit, that phrase don’t play. Over a certain amount of impact a nominally “private” company should be considered a public institution, subject to significant oversight by government, its employees, and the public at large. Any notion at this point in time that what ails this country is over-regulation of large institutions is the stuff of dystopian sci fi.

There’s a phrase that’s played well in many a movie: “This ain’t a democracy”. It’s a fun show-stopper. The character who says it is frequently the lead, fettered by some lily-livered nabob, a worry wart of some kind, or a clueless corporate weasel. The context is a crisis with a looming deadline before disaster. There’s no time waste. The job must get done.

Tellingly, I hear that a lot at in different work environments, particularly when the working environment becomes so mired and dysfunctional that people start speaking out. If you spend 8 hours a day, or in my case 10 to 16, the idea that “this ain’t a democracy” sounds is menacing. Are you kidding? A third – or more – of your daily life has no relationship to democracy? Back on day one we were all called into a meeting. “We want to hear from you,” said the company’s owners. “We need you to know that we value your commitment and value your input. Don’t hold back. Share your opinion. We want you to be proud, committed, and we need you to understand that this things works best when we all work together.” That’s day one. Day 3, when you see what’s up and offer some ideas about what’s wrong and what might be done now, while it’s still early to head off a looming catastrophe this is the typical reply: “I really appreciate what you’re saying, but right now we’ve got a lot to do, we’re over budget and behind schedule, so what I need from you right now is let’s just get through this. It’s not what we wanted, but unfortunately that’s where we are. We’ll get all that sorted out next go ’round.” If that happened once, I’d get it, but in my experience that’s the routine.

Later – not much later – as the advice not considered devolves into full blown crisis, the decision making goes inadequate to desperate. Steps that would have resulted in a few days overage explode into mistakes, do-overs, and ultimately massive overages and schedule delays. Frequently there’s well founded fear that the company is about to go under. Sometimes it actually does. Either way someone’s assistant gets fired, scapegoats protecting the way things are. At some point in the process, when someone with little authority speaks truth to power, it happens: “This is not a democracy”. It might be unstated, it might just be tone. In my experience they actually say it, and often. It gets a laugh, but it’s hardly a joke.

Eventually, as always, the job gets done. It’s a pale wan mess compared to the aspirations first put forth, but in the end the team is gathered together and offered these fine words: “Guys, I just want to congratulate you all. It was a tough job. We faced a lot of hurdles, but I just want to say you all really pulled through and I’m so proud of you all. You’re the greatest, and I can’t wait to work with all again soon.” Fist pumps and high fives.

With that the project ends, and the team hopes wonders whether they’ll indeed be hired again next go around. The finished product frequently doesn’t look that great on the resume, it’s nothing to be proud of, as much as we’d like it to be, but it’s money, and we all need to pay the bills. It’s not a democracy. Democracy isn’t flawless, but it works better than this.

How about a new phrase. It’s a little wordy: “That thing you made me help you produce is a travesty. It impresses no one. The way you run your company sucks. Somehow you’ve got the ear of an executive somewhere who protects your ass from the black-and-blue boot mark it deserves. About time we damn well tell you how the hell to run your sorry-ass business.”

Parking Lot Capitalism

Parking Lot Capitalism

There’s a lot prattle about how the government can’t do anything right, how market forces are the way to getting a job or service done efficiently, effectively, cheaply and how they create freedom, jobs, wealth and innovation.

There’s a parking lot in our city that succinctly lays waste to the myths that have been core to the capitalist talking points of America.

These parking lots used to be run by the city government. Each space had a meter, the price was cheap, the fines for overstaying your allotted time sufficiently motivating, spaces were plenty, getting in and out was convenient and easy. These lots at once beckoned people to park while at the same time fostering turnover that was at once considerate of the shopper’s schedule and the shop owners’ desire for ongoing turnover.

At a certain point the city “de-regulated” the lots and turned them over to be run by private companies. Before long the meter heads were gone leaving behind decapitated poles, new ticket spitters appeared at the entrances, and a cashier booths went up at the exit. The spitters at the entrance created short lines that backed up into the street from the entrance, the cashier booths formed exit codas that saw wait times of up to 7 minutes an increase of infinite percent compared to the zero wait time when the lot was still under management by the government. And then, of course there was price which went from a dollar an hour to 3 dollars every 20 minutes.

Where once there was an inexpensive, efficient system of parking, there were now two inconvenient bottlenecks, featuring longer waits and higher prices. Perhaps one could argue the parking lot managers were “job creators”: where once there was free entry, now there were hired attendants working in fluorescent-lit cashier stalls holding out languid hands for payment while drivers fished around in their wallets, all parties sucking fumes. But it turns out the city-owned lot was the better creator of jobs – the meter maid, the meter maintenance workers whose employment was higher skilled, and those jobs were better paid.

This, in a nutshell, is the face of capitalism unfettered regulation: poorer service, higher prices, fewer jobs, and a crappier workplace environment with lower skilled, poorer paid jobs. But what about consumer choice? Drivers could in theory choose their spot or choose another lot, but this pale smorgasbord featured not one iota of innovation; every lot in the neighborhood was run by the same private company the same lackluster way.

We hear so much about how incompetent government can be vs the miracles of deregulated industry. Perhaps we’re hearing it so often because the resumes can’t speak for themselves. It takes an army of PR to defeat the truth: unfettered capitalism works well for the top executive who cashes in on the bottom-of-the-line, but for everyone else it’s lose/lose. Deregulation, anti-government, pro market prattle is a myth, and these parking lots capture the scam with an efficiency deregulated markets only dream of.

Why Corporate America is like the Fanatical Religious Right

Why Corporate America is like the Fanatical Religious Right


Perhaps because corporate management is so aloof of what it does, so hostile to the people who do the actual work of their institution and uncomprehending of the needs of the job at hand, that they are leaders without value or meaningful purpose. They are afforded huge compensation and reward that suggest value where none actually exists. They are, in a word, frauds. Like fanatical right wing religion offering promises and twaddle in exchange for enormous profits, power and status, the corporate elite of this gilded age put most of their work into self-justification: PR, messaging, branding, packaging, promising, deflecting, influencing. They offer a tome of flimflam, and their closest relatives are snake oil salesmen of an old-school bible-thumping traveling huckster. They believe this is hard work, on a par with the kind of talent that goes into getting the actual job actually done. The only reason it’s hard work is because the gap between what they say and what they do is a chasm requiring the linguistic equivalent of martial arts to achieve. That energy would be better spent on actually doing rather than managing.

Hip Youth vs Stodgy Old Farts

A trope is haunting America. It was a good trope that served an important purpose in its time. Before it was a trope it was fresh idea that haunted those of a certain generation whose tired notions of social order were stifling and oppressive to their children. These children – generally born and raised in the 50s – embarked on a revolt in the 60s that rudely informed an older generation knew that the youth were tired of things the way they were, were hungry for fairness, and had the will, the intelligence and motivation to make manifest long-term change.

In those days simply growing your hair was a revolutionary act. Dressing outrageously, dancing freely, getting laid, getting high, each in and of itself was a political statement that contributed to social change. The kids knew where it was at. The adults were clueless. We still celebrate that revolution in movies like Hairspray, Footloose, and just about any movie featuring students and teachers, where young kids dancing, listening to music, dressing in ways to upset the older generation either break the chains of oppression or seduce the older generation to be cool and hip. Hip youth vs stodgy old farts. It’s a trope. And lately it’s been turned against us.

The most frequent version of it plays out through new technologies. That’s the domain of the young and hip. Old and stodgy is anyone less than fluent with social media. “Old people”, i.e. anyone old enough to have kids, marvel at kids of today: “They know how to use my smart phone. I don’t even know how to use it”. In corporate culture, if you want to be hip, you’re going to need some kids to come in and run new media department, because kids these days know that stuff”. They’ll work cheap, they’ll get it done fast, because… “they were born with this stuff”. And kids believe it. They know Facebook, they know Twitter, they know video games better than anyone 5 years their senior.

Kids these days are as fluent with what they’re fluent with as adults were when they were kids. No smarter, no dumber. Likewise, adults are as dumb or smart as they’ve ever been, and they’re more or less in touch with whatever they’ve been involved with. Older people today haven’t forgotten what it means to be hip.  They identify with it, and are a lot more likely to be supportive and involved with their kids than the parents of the 60s generation. They’re far less likely to use the crutch of seniority to lord over their kids an oppressive authoritarianism. This ain’t your grandpa’s century. The cult of young and hip is now a stale old idea.

Much of what passes for youth genius is frequently no more than fluency with consumer products. What’s scooped up under the moniker of old stodginess is the value of process — of values and skills accrued over time.

Corporations prey on the youth and the old alike to minimize the security, recognition, and salaries of both. Adorning themselves the patronizing tone of real grandparents, CorporateSpeak waxes incredulously at the incredible skill sets of “kids these days”, within earshot of disquieted older generation workers, who must suddenly worry about the invalidation that comes with age. Forget about knowledge and skills built on years of dedication.  You’re not hip enough. You’re replaceable by someone with skills in Facebook, because they’ll get it done for a fraction of the cost. Kids these days are young, talented and eager to please.  It doesn’t matter that many kids these days, out of their element, have no idea how to run, much less develop a system that can perform over time. They get a job that’s beyond them and lose twice: either they’re under paid for work they’re good at, or humiliated when failing to perform in a position they weren’t sufficiently qualified to do.

There once was a day when a stodgy clueless older generation, steeped in a tradition of seniority, wore out their own welcome and got their comeuppance at the hands of an enlightened youth movement. Now there’s a generation of youths less fluent with the past, endowed with a false sense of superiority by a corporate culture that pays them more in praise than in salary.

Perhaps its time to consider trotting the trope to the plank and letting it plop into the sea of history. Let it rise again should a future generation need it to right the wrongs of seniority. But right now the world needs to value youth and experience alike. The old want to stay in touch with the hip of their youth, and the youth need the wisdom and experience of the old. The youth and the old of today would do well to let Corporate America know they value each other want the stodgy authority of this generation — the predatory corporate world — to get out of their way.


I’ve been with my ISP for about 8 years. For all of those years, this one included, the internet service conks out frequently. The standard routine goes like this: I call them up to let them know. They blame your network. They blame your computer. They explain things that they themselves don’t understand. It takes some doing, but eventually I succeed at convincing them that the problem lies with their company, not my home equipment, and they respond by sending out a tech. The tech shows up between 1 and 5 days later. The techs tend to be, by and large, competent people, but by the time they arrive the service is working again. So the tech scribbles a few notes, leaves a document, and departs. Within a few days the service is down again.

This has been going on for years. Every so often TWC does something dramatic to fix the problem: replaces a cable, replaces a line, checks a connection on the pole. Every so often that results in the service becoming reliable for a few weeks. Once it was even reliable for a few months. Inevitably it breaks down again.

I’d be glad to switch to a better ISP. The only alternative in my neighborhood is AT&T. My friend uses AT&T. She has the same problem — intermittent service — and endures more or less the same routine when she calls tech support. As for options to get home internet, that’s about it — unless you’re willing to hurl the rest of your wallet at this problem and pay for corporate quality internet service. But I frequently work for a company that has that corporate quality service. They have the same problem as I do at home. It sucks just as bad, only they pay 12 times as much.

There are a number of books and articles pointing to the root causes that gave birth to the abomination that is US ISP, most notably the regional monopolies and duopolies, the squelched competition permitted nationwide. A good anti-trust movement is long overdue. But there’s perhaps another more insidious monopoly undergirding the glaringly obvious one: it’s the monopoly, or more accurately, a monomania of low quality and poor choices that’s a taken-for-granted staple of corporate culture. No matter what company is offering what, for the most part they’re pressing their bottom line so hard that quality and pride of product have long sense left the building. That’s how you get fast food that isn’t even really food, fancy restaurants that charge an arm and a leg to serve low-grade crap with lipstick-on-a-pig grade garnish. There’s the monopoly of vision by corporate culture in general that accommodates a huge plethora of options around packaging and branding but almost none when it comes to actual quality and functionality. It’s what happens when after years of focus on spin, branding, packaging, and PR, at the expense of actually doing what it takes to produce genuine quality.